- List All

  • Web   The Point


+ Theology/Religion + Culture + Marriage & Family + Politics + Academia + Human Rights
Christianity Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Religion Blogs - Blog Top Sites
Link With Us - Web Directory

« Fighting for Burma -- Part 2 | Main | Goldberg on A-jad and Columbia »

September 28, 2007

Noonan on A-jad and Presidential Candidates

We've had a lot of discussion this week about A-jad's visit to Columbia U. Peggy Noonan's thoughts on the matter are worth considering:

So much silencing. It seems so weak, so out of keeping with who we are. We love the tradition of free speech in America, but you don't want to judge its health by what we've done with it lately, or to it.

In 1960 the premier of the Soviet Union came and spoke in the United States. Nikita Khrushchev was our sworn enemy, and a vulgarian--sweaty faced, ill educated, dressed in a suit just off the racks from the Gulag Kresge's. I was a child, but I remember the impression he made. He took off his shoe and banged it, literally, on the soft beige wood of a desk at the U.N., as he fulminated. His nation had nuclear weapons. They were aimed at us.

...Khrushchev's trip and Castro's were all about propaganda, all about sticking it to Uncle Sam. And here's what happened: Nothing. Their presence hurt our country exactly zero percent. In fact it raised us high, reminding the world we are the confident nation that lets its foes speak uncensored. As an adult nation would.

Noonan expands the point to the presidential candidates:

Domestically, the Democratic presidential candidates appear only before supportive groups. They don't speak to antitax groups and talk about their own assumptions regarding tax policy. They don't go to traditional values groups.

It's all very controlled. And it's unworthy of a great nation. When people say the campaign feels artificial, that's what they mean. It's not John Edwards's hairspray or Hillary Clinton's makeup. It's that they give every sign of being afraid to speak and listen to those who haven't been patted down by thought-cops for unacceptable views.

The Republicans are the same. An invitation to debate on Univision, the Spanish-language network? They have scheduling conflicts. What about the Log Cabin Republicans? No time right now.

How unserious.

...The staffs, gurus and handlers of all the candidates are always afraid their guy will get booed. But do they realize how tired we are of hearing the tepid applause that follows the predictable pander?

I know they're all always eager to laud Ronald Reagan. But Reagan began his fall 1980 campaign in the South Bronx, and argued his case with people on the street. After he was elected, he pleaded for peace in letters to Leonid Brezhnev. Too bad he wasn't tough enough. Oh wait.

Though this is somewhat tangential, it's telling and unfortunate that Noonan had to hearken back to the 1980s to find a leader who stood insistently for principles. Back then, the two national parties really stood for different principles and different fundamental policies. But I'm not even sure why we have two national parties anymore. Aren't they the same? Two boats sailing for 5th-century Rome by way of modern Amsterdam, merely at different speeds?

Perhaps I'll be forgiven for dreaming of another 1854.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Noonan on A-jad and Presidential Candidates:


Jesse Knoll

"But I'm not even sure why we have two national parties anymore. Aren't they the same? "

Couldn't agree more. How much more irrelevant can either party get to the average american? No one believes or cares what either party says. Those that do, are fervent supporters of either party- it makes them seem sad, and weak.

I used to be a republican because they at least stood for things I believed in. There is no current political party which is even remotely relevent to me at this point. Isn't that another one of those "signs a civilization is in the midst of it's downfall"?


Quote from above re Khruschev: " He took off his shoe and banged it, literally, on the soft beige wood of a desk at the U.N., as he fulminated. His nation had nuclear weapons. They were aimed at us."

Mr. K. was the best spokesman (however unwitting) for the evils of Communism around at that time!!!

I was a small child back then who remembered he also said "Your grandchildren will live under Communism." Last I heard a grandson of his moved here (in the US) to live.

Years later, a former fighter pilot who flew in the whole "Bay of Pigs" nuclear standoff said "I had a nuclear weapon in my plane".

Scary times. I am amazed when I hear an adult (from that era) NOW act as if the Cold War was not a real threat to us.

The comments to this entry are closed.